In 1828 Dupin, a famous French lawyer, investigated the legality of the Trail of Christ - -
1. The Lord’s apprehension was illegal.
2. That He being conducted to Annas was illegal.
3. Examination at night illegal.
4. Ill-treatment in the Hall of Caiaphas.
5. Proceedings on a Fast Day.
6. Caiaphas, the accuser to be the judge.
7. Testimony of witnesses perverted.
8. His own admission insufficient – reception illegal.
9. Outrages and blows illegal.
10. Condemnation of Jews for a capital offense, over which they had no jurisdiction, illegal.
11. Accusation of political crime of treason wholly different from that for which He was apprehended.
12. The charge itself false - - Christ never claimed dominion asserted.
13. Pilate acquitted Christ – further proceedings illegal.
14. Reference to Herod illegal. His trial before a competent tribunal had failed.
15. Acquitted also by Herod - - detention illegal.
16. Pilate, yielding to the clamors of the Jews against his own finding - - grossly illegal.
17. His last appeal to deliver Barrabas to them admitted the illegality of his action.
18. All the subsequent indignities including the ex3cution on Calvary - - grossly illegal.
19. His crime written on the Cross not that for which He was apprehended.